To Dread or Not To Dread

Not too long ago, I had a conversation with an individual who’s one of the “big wigs” of a particular corporation in Atlanta. She was telling me about the time when an individual was interviewed for a position at the company and although his interviewing skills were great, the only thing that was stopping him from getting the job was the fact that he wore dreadlocks. One of her colleagues was the one that interviewed him.  Well, after she spoke to her colleagues during the decision-making process, she called up the young man and advised him that if he wanted the job, he would have to get rid of his dreadlocks. Although I don’t wear dreadlocks, I found myself feeling horribly offended.

So I asked her, “You mean to tell me that you and your colleagues wasn’t sure if you wanted to hire him or not, simply because he wore dreadlocks? Did they look dirty and messy?”

She said, “Not at all. He was well groomed and they looked very clean and neat. But when you are in corporate America, you can’t wear things like that. Everything has to be uniformed.”

“So what happened next?”

“Well, after I advised him to cut his dreads, he cut them and that’s when he got the job.”

I was floored. First of all, I have worked in corporate America for years and at every job, there were people who wore dreadlocks. So the fact that she stated that you can’t wear your hair like that was completely false. I don’t know which company that she worked for but that type of discrimination doesn’t hold weight in every company. I used to work for a company that was predominantly white and I saw a few men and women (both Black and white) who sported dreadlocks and they didn’t get treated like less of a person because of their hair. As a matter of fact, a few of them were in a higher position that I was.

Help me to understand something: Is this the kind of world that we live in where your hair determines whether you’re capable of doing a job? I do understand that if your hair is drawing way too much attention (ex: bright neon hair, fluorescent lights in your hair, glitter all thru your hair, a huge spiked Mohawk, a freaking palm tree growing out of your scalp), that it can caused a serious distraction and thus, it can cause a lil’ damage to the integrity of the company. However, if it’s a sensible hairstyle that’s neat, it shouldn’t be a problem.

Furthermore, a hairstyle doesn’t determine whether someone can do their job or not. There are quite a few people that don’t wear dreadlocks and yet they don’t have the skills it takes to land a job. More of the focus should be on the person’s intelligence, their education level, and their ability to learn. It would be an outright shame for someone to go to school to learn a trade or get a degree and then after all of those nights that they’ve studied and worked hard, it is now consider a waste of their time because of their hair. What type of message are we sending here? Are we saying that we’re more impressed with the quality of someone’s hair than the quality of their work?

Having dreadlocks shouldn’t determine a person’s future. If they keep them neat and nicely trimmed, leave them alone. Don’t lose a valuable asset to your company based off of narrow-minded thinking. For this individual to be a Black woman, she should’ve definitely understood that concept especially since unfortunately in this cold world, she already has two strikes against her; she’s Black and she’s a female. We already know that in corporate America, it is basically a white male-dominated industry and because you’re Black and you’re a woman, the people that you work for are going to automatically think that you don’t know as much as you say you do.

So yes, I was taken aback when she suggested that the young man cut his dreads. If a person is wearing dreadlocks, embrace it; don’t erase it. There are an astronomical amount of men and women that are rotting in prisons from all over the world. A lot of them didn’t wear dreadlocks when they were doing crime and a lot of them wasn’t wearing dreadlocks when they were put in prison. So my point is that a person’s dreadlocks doesn’t make this wise or unwise. It doesn’t determine whether they’re smart or stupid. It doesn’t even determine if they’re more creative and listen to poetry all day. It’s just hair. In the famous words of India Arie, “It’s not what’s on your head; it’s what’s underneath it.”


Copyright © 2014 by Sonica Jackson

***The views and opinions expressed here on my website are solely those of myself and do not in any way represent the views and opinions of WordPress or anyone else.


11 thoughts on “To Dread or Not To Dread

  1. Yes it’s the subtlety isn’t it? A Black person’s natural hair is not corporate America but a white person’s is. Even Black people reject their own natural hair as unwanted and ‘nappy’ so maybe this person can also be excused for being a little backward.

    • That’s another thing that came to mind was the fact that SHE was a Black person and yet she disapproved of a Black person’s hair. It’s true that there are many Black people that disapprove with natural hair among other things and because of that, we will have a hard time getting corporate America to accept our identity for what it is because we’re so hard on ourselves.

      • Ah, I see. I have thought about this since I read your post. If YOU were in the same spot i.e really needed the job, felt like it could be a great new start an’ all – but then were told to cut your meticulously grown back length locks – what would YOU do?

      • I would look for another place to work. Plain and simple. My hair should not ever determine whether or not I can do a job. Considering the fact that this individual had awesome interviewing skills, lets me know that he had the skills it took for them to even consider him for a job. So they shouldn’t have made his hair a concern…and for this Black woman to piggy back off of it had me looking at her sideways.

  2. Totally with you. I can understand a wanted quality – neat and clean and polite – but individuality should not be sacrificed. I’ve known managers to interpret a company rule by their own definition and apply it to all under them. I’m not sure if it was misinterpretation or a touch of power-gone-to-the-head, but the result was the same – discrimination in one form or another.

    If a company has such a rule, they will lose genuine talent and eventually customers, too.

      • Isn’t that the same excuse that was used to discriminate against race and gender in the not-so-distant past? That the company wanted it? Nobody ever stood up and admitted to being racist or sexist (although you could tell they were), they just hid behind “rules” or “the company wanted”.

        I think that woman is plain not seeing that discrimination exists beyond race and gender, and that all other forms are somehow “okay”. That’s the shame of it, that’s she’s all right with such a rule or preference.

        I hope that man who got the job finds a better company and moves on. I really do. He deserves better than that.

      • Excellent point! I’m sure that he was not at all happy about having to get rid of his dreads and for that reason, I’m sure that he’ll be looking for another job pretty soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s